<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Modifying Public Domain Miniature Painting Images Using Photoshop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://perpetualplum.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/modifying-public-domain-images-using-photoshop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://perpetualplum.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/modifying-public-domain-images-using-photoshop/</link>
	<description>Recycled and Upcycled Art and Crafts, Great Finds, Junking, Travel, Art, and Free Project Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:06:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: perpetualplum</title>
		<link>http://perpetualplum.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/modifying-public-domain-images-using-photoshop/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>perpetualplum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perpetualplum.wordpress.com/?p=258#comment-670</guid>
		<description>Since not everyone uses the same image editing tool, it would be difficult to follow if you weren&#039;t familiar with Photoshop.

Also it&#039;s hard to see the changes in the images in the blog post.  The images have been resized to fit within the blog post.  In flickr, the images are much larger.  When you scan something in at 300 dpi (dots per inch), you can subtly change the texture of the image.  The improves the print quality.

In your photo editing software the dot size is fixed, so a 4&quot;x5&quot; 300 dpi image is larger than a 72 dpi image.  The printer will print more colored dots per inch, i.e. a 4&quot;x5&quot; 300dpi image is the same size as a 4&quot;x5&quot; 72dpi image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since not everyone uses the same image editing tool, it would be difficult to follow if you weren&#8217;t familiar with Photoshop.</p>
<p>Also it&#8217;s hard to see the changes in the images in the blog post.  The images have been resized to fit within the blog post.  In flickr, the images are much larger.  When you scan something in at 300 dpi (dots per inch), you can subtly change the texture of the image.  The improves the print quality.</p>
<p>In your photo editing software the dot size is fixed, so a 4&#8243;x5&#8243; 300 dpi image is larger than a 72 dpi image.  The printer will print more colored dots per inch, i.e. a 4&#8243;x5&#8243; 300dpi image is the same size as a 4&#8243;x5&#8243; 72dpi image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belinda</title>
		<link>http://perpetualplum.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/modifying-public-domain-images-using-photoshop/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>Belinda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perpetualplum.wordpress.com/?p=258#comment-669</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t pretend to understand what you did to the images, but I really like the effects. :)  I love the old Victorian images like the ones in this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t pretend to understand what you did to the images, but I really like the effects. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I love the old Victorian images like the ones in this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
